Hysteroscopic metroplasty and its reproductive impact among the social networks: A cross-sectional analysis on video quality, reliability and creators’ opinions on YouTube, TikTok and Instagram

Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni
First
;
Angioni, Stefano
Second
;
Saponara, Stefania;Sicilia, Gilda;Mignacca, Andrea;Caiazzo, Alessandro;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: Usefulness of hysteroscopic metroplasty to improve reproductive outcomes is controversial and debated among reproductive specialists and, consequently, patients. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional analysis to assess the quality, reliability, and level of misinformation in YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok videos about hysteroscopic metroplasty. Videos on each social network retrieved using “hysteroscopy” and “septate uterus” or “uterine septum” as keywords were assessed using Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audio-visual (PEMAT A/V) content, the modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Global Quality Scale (GQS), Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI) and Misinformation assessment. Results: One hundred fifteen videos (47 from YouTube, 35 from TikTok, and 33 from Instagram) were included. Median PEMAT A/V Understandability and Actionability scores were 50.0 % (IQR: 0–63.3) and 20 % (IQR:0.0–50.0). Actionability was higher YouTube relative to TikTok and Instagram (50.0 % [IQR: 0–75.0] vs. 0 % [IQR: 0–66.0]; p < 0.001 and 0 % [IQR: 0–33.0], p < 0.001), with no significant differences for Understandability. Median mDISCERN was 3 (IQR: 0–3), with higher score for YouTube compared to TikTok and Instagram (3 [IQR: 0–3] vs. 0 [IQR: 0–23], p < 0.001 and 1 [IQR 0–3.0], p < 0.001 respectively). VIQI showed low-level content (median 9; IQR: 4–19) and no differences among social media platforms. GQS was low (median 2 [IQR 1–4.5]), with no differences in subgroup analysis. Videos on YouTube (97.9 %) and TikTok (62.9 %) favored hysteroscopic metroplasty, while Instagram content was against in 63.6 % of cases (p < 0.001). While most videos were found to be either completely or partially accurate, significant differences in misinformation levels were observed across platforms, with YouTube exhibiting the lowest rate of inaccuracies compared to TikTok and Instagram. (8.5 % vs. 42.9 % and 36.4 %; p <0.001, respectively). Conclusion: Quality of social networks’ videos on hysteroscopic metroplasty seems unsatisfactory, but with low levels of misinformation. YouTube and TikTok were more favorable than Instagram regarding the usefulness of metroplasty. In contrast, a favorable opinion regarding its efficacy in fertility improvement was retrieved in each social.
2025
2024
Inglese
195
105776
1
7
7
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386505624004398?via=ihub
Esperti anonimi
internazionale
scientifica
Hysteroscopy; Infertility; Internet; Misinformation; Mullerian anomalies; Social media; Uterine septum
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
no
Vitale, Salvatore Giovanni; Angioni, Stefano; Saponara, Stefania; Sicilia, Gilda; Mignacca, Andrea; Caiazzo, Alessandro; Franciscis, Pasquale De; Riem ...espandi
1.1 Articolo in rivista
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
262
8
open
Files in This Item:
File Size Format  
Vitale Int J Med Infrom 2025.pdf

open access

Description: Articolo principale
Type: versione editoriale
Size 491.44 kB
Format Adobe PDF
491.44 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Questionnaire and social

Share on:
Impostazioni cookie