The defectiveness of propaganda

Contesi, Filippo;
2024-01-01

Abstract

We argue that political propaganda is a negative phenomenon, against a recent strain of philosophical theorizing that argues that political propaganda can sometimes be neutral or even positive. After an exploration of the sense and connotation of the word 'propaganda' in ordinary use and in the scholarly literature, we discuss Ross's initial account of propaganda as an epistemically defective form of political communication. We claim that, with some refinements, it is an explanatorily useful analysis. We then assess two prominent attempts that aim at classifying legitimate cases of public communication as cases of propaganda, namely Ross's revision of her previous model and Stanley's influential account. We show that some of the cases in contention are problematic and that the arguments the authors offer for classifying other non-problematic cases as propaganda are inconclusive. We also argue that the idea of considering legitimate public communication as propaganda is unmotivated.
2024
Inglese
74
4
1080
1102
23
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
scientifica
Emotion; Epistemic defectiveness; Meaning revision; Propaganda; Social-political philosophy
Bonard, Constant; Contesi, Filippo; Marques, Teresa
1.1 Articolo in rivista
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
262
3
partially_open
Files in This Item:
File Size Format  
pqae048.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Type: versione editoriale
Size 477.11 kB
Format Adobe PDF
477.11 kB Adobe PDF & nbsp; View / Open   Request a copy
R&R-The Defectiveness of Propaganda (1).pdf

Open Access from 17/05/2025

Type: Author’s Accepted Manuscript AAM, Post-print, (version accepted by the publisher)
Size 271.21 kB
Format Adobe PDF
271.21 kB Adobe PDF View/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Questionnaire and social

Share on:
Impostazioni cookie