Andrea Manconi
The defectiveness of propaganda
Contesi, Filippo;
2024-01-01
Abstract
We argue that political propaganda is a negative phenomenon, against a recent strain of philosophical theorizing that argues that political propaganda can sometimes be neutral or even positive. After an exploration of the sense and connotation of the word 'propaganda' in ordinary use and in the scholarly literature, we discuss Ross's initial account of propaganda as an epistemically defective form of political communication. We claim that, with some refinements, it is an explanatorily useful analysis. We then assess two prominent attempts that aim at classifying legitimate cases of public communication as cases of propaganda, namely Ross's revision of her previous model and Stanley's influential account. We show that some of the cases in contention are problematic and that the arguments the authors offer for classifying other non-problematic cases as propaganda are inconclusive. We also argue that the idea of considering legitimate public communication as propaganda is unmotivated.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
| pqae048.pdf Solo gestori archivio
Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 477.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
|
477.11 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
| R&R-The Defectiveness of Propaganda (1).pdf Open Access dal 17/05/2025
Tipologia: versione post-print (AAM)
Dimensione 271.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
|
271.21 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
Università degli Studi di Cagliari