Andrea Manconi

The defectiveness of propaganda

Contesi, Filippo;
2024-01-01

Abstract

We argue that political propaganda is a negative phenomenon, against a recent strain of philosophical theorizing that argues that political propaganda can sometimes be neutral or even positive. After an exploration of the sense and connotation of the word 'propaganda' in ordinary use and in the scholarly literature, we discuss Ross's initial account of propaganda as an epistemically defective form of political communication. We claim that, with some refinements, it is an explanatorily useful analysis. We then assess two prominent attempts that aim at classifying legitimate cases of public communication as cases of propaganda, namely Ross's revision of her previous model and Stanley's influential account. We show that some of the cases in contention are problematic and that the arguments the authors offer for classifying other non-problematic cases as propaganda are inconclusive. We also argue that the idea of considering legitimate public communication as propaganda is unmotivated.
2024
Inglese
74
4
1080
1102
23
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
scientifica
Emotion; Epistemic defectiveness; Meaning revision; Propaganda; Social-political philosophy
Bonard, Constant; Contesi, Filippo; Marques, Teresa
1.1 Articolo in rivista
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
262
3
partially_open
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pqae048.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: versione editoriale (VoR)
Dimensione 477.11 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
477.11 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
R&R-The Defectiveness of Propaganda (1).pdf

Open Access dal 17/05/2025

Tipologia: versione post-print (AAM)
Dimensione 271.21 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
271.21 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Questionario e social

Condividi su:
Impostazioni cookie